RSS

Composition Dates for the Major Commentaries upon Minhaj al-Talibin

31 Aug

Dar al-Minhaj’s edition of Kifayat al-Akhyar (2007) includes a very interesting note (p.632) by shaykh Abd al-Rahman Rashid al-Khatib on the composition dates for the major shuruh upon the Minhaj al-Talibin of Imam al-Nawawi.

Ibn Hajar’s (909-974) writing of Tuhfat al-Muhtaj began in Makka 957 and was completed by the end of the same year within eleven months, when he was in his late 40s.

al-Khatib al-Shirbini’s (d.977) writing of Mughni al-Muhtaj began in Cairo in 959 and was completed four years later in 963.

Shams al-Ramli’s (917-1004) writing of Nihayat al-Muhtaj began in Cairo in 963 and was completed ten years later in 973, when he was in his mid-50s.

Some thoughts:

Ibn Hajar was thus the first of the ‘Ulama al-Khams (Zakariyah al-Ansari [826-926] and his four students Shihab al-Ramli, Ibn Hajar, al-Khatib al-Shirbini, and Shams al-Ramli) to write a direct sharh on the Minhaj. Managing to complete in within a year is quite a staggering achievement. I have yet to find conclusive evidence that Khatib al-Shirbini had access to Ibn Hajar’s sharh, since Ibn Hajar was in Makka. Al-Ramli certainly had access to both when writing his commentary. Shams al-Ramli and al-Khatib concur in the majority of masa’il in the ibadah sections, following the teachings of Shihab al-Ramli. Ibn Hajar tends to follow Shaykh al-Islam.

The reputation and preference that Tuhfat al-Muhtaj has outside of Egypt certainly has much to do with Ibn Hajar’s milieu being Makka. From here it rapidly spread among the visiting Shafi’iyah from Yemen, Syria, and beyond. Nihayat al-Muhtaj, however, is certainly no less a work and indeed many major Shafi’iyah of the last few centuries (particularly in Egypt) deemed it superior. Shams al-Ramli was widely regarded as the leading Shafi’i of Egypt in his day after the death of his father, Shihab, in 957, when Shams was 40 years old. His father had seen to it that Shams had a comprehensive education in all fields of learning so that he would be independent of anyone. Shams attended the classes of Shaykh al-Islam Zakariya al-Ansari as a young boy with his father even before Ibn Hajar joined Shaykh al-Islam’s classes, and became instrumental in transmitting Shaykh al-Islam’s books via ijaza. Ibn Hajar joined Shaykh al-Islam’s classes in 924, when he was 15, and stayed with the Shaykh for two years till 926, when Shaykh al-Islam died. Shihab al-Din inherited Shaykh al-Islam’s position in Egypt and continued to teach Ibn Hajar (until he finally settled in Makka in 940, aged 31), al-Khatib al-Shirbini, and his son Shams until Shihab’s death in 957.

Shams, aged 40, immediately inherited his father’s teaching position at al-Azhar and was also appointed to teach at the Khashabiya and Sharafiya madrasas, posts specifically set aside for the top Shafi’i scholar. All this whilst al-Khatib al-Shirbini, his former teacher, was still alive. His contemporaries called him al-Shafi’i al-Saghir and he was considered by his associates to be the mujaddid of the 10th Hijri century. Whilst writing al-Nihayah, Shams was fully aware of what both Ibn Hajar and al-Khatib had written in their respective commentaries whilst critically engaging with and building upon their works. Upon completion in 973, Nihayah was read to 400 of the top scholars and students of the time who all gave it their critical approval. al-Khatib was still alive and most likely in the sessions, for he was close to Shams and worked with him in compiling his father’s fatawa. For the attendees, Nihayat al-Muhtaj was the definitive commentary on Minhaj al-Talibin. It also has the advantage of being much clearer than Tuhfah due to having 10 years to review and revise the style and content. Tuhfah suffers from some very difficult and opaque language, perhaps as a result of being written in 11 months (almost ten times less the time) with no final revision, proofreading, or editing.

That being said, almost nowhere today today can one find either of these two texts being taught completely. Mughni al-Muhtaj and the earlier Kanz al-Raghibin of al-Mahalli are the only direct commentaries still being taught.

Among the lesser-known printed commentaries of note are:

  • Al-Zarkashi – Al-Dibaj fi Tawdih al-Minhaj
  • Al-Damiri – Najm al-Wahhaj
  • Ibn Qadi Shuhbah – Bidayat al-Muhtaj
Advertisements
 
5 Comments

Posted by on August 31, 2013 in Books, Fiqh

 

5 responses to “Composition Dates for the Major Commentaries upon Minhaj al-Talibin

  1. Noor al-Deen

    July 26, 2014 at 12:14 am

    Salaams Sidi, I was looking for evidence that al-Khatib al-Shirbini studied directly with Zakariyya al-Ansari, and as far as I can tell, he did not. Do you know of an historical source (e.g. biographical dictionary or chronicle) that suggests they met in person? Thank you in advance. WS.

     
    • Al-Asiri

      July 27, 2014 at 12:49 am

      Wa alaykum salam. The most obvious piece of evidence is in Mughni al-Muhtaj itself. Al-Khatib refers to Shaykh al-Islam as ‘Shaykhuna’ throughout. Mawlana Taha Karan also asserts that al-Khatib al-Shirbini was a student of Shaykh al-Islam, as do other researchers such as Tariq Yusuf Hasan Jabir in his Masters thesis on Zakariya al-Ansari for the University of Jordan. He quotes DKI’s edition of Ibn al-‘Imad’s Shadharat al-Dhahab, which I don’t have (mine is Dar Ibn Kathir) so I cannot verify, as saying that al-Khatib was a student of Zakariya al-Ansari. I hope this helps.

       
      • Noor al-Deen

        July 27, 2014 at 9:45 pm

        Thank you, Sidi! And Eid mubarak! Yes, this is very helpful. I will follow up with the Shadharat al-dhahab ref. that you mention. Believe it or not, I coincidentally have a copy of Tariq Jabir’s thesis in front of me as I type. Ws. -Noor

         
      • Al-Asiri

        July 31, 2014 at 8:22 am

        Masha’Allah what a coincidence. Please let me know if you find the reference. As I said, my version doesn’t have it but often different publishers include material others do not. I think failing that, the fact that al-Khatib refers to shaykh al-Islam as ‘shaykhuna’ and Shihab al-Ramli as ‘Shaykhi’ throughout Mughni al-Muhtaj makes the relationship clear.

         
  2. Al-Asiri

    December 31, 2014 at 4:30 pm

    Good news! Page 282 of the Dar al-Faruq edition of al-Kurdi’s al-Fawa’id al-Madaniyah mentions that Shaykh al-Islam was the teacher of Khatib al-Shirbini. Coming from Muhammad b. Sulayman al-Kurdi, I would certainly take that as evidence.

     

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: